About this Event
"RACIAL RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS"
ADEJA Weekly Discussion Meetings in London: A Comprehensive Analysis
The African Diaspora Equity and Justice Alliance (ADEJA) has been holding weekly discussion meetings around London, generating significant dialogue around the complex issues of reparatory justice for those classified as Black and Mixed-Black worldwide. These meetings are animated by the invocation of the mythical John Canoe/Junkanoo, a figure dubbed the "Reparation Fascist," posited as an international legal personality aimed at addressing historical injustices. This article delves into the intricacies of these discussions, the central arguments, the character of John Canoe/Junkanoo, and the broader implications for human rights and reparatory justice.
The Mythical John Canoe/Junkanoo: A Symbol for Reparatory Justice
John Canoe, also known as Junkanoo, is a mythical figure rooted in African and Caribbean traditions. Historically, John Canoe represents resilience and cultural celebration amidst oppression, symbolized through the vibrant Junkanoo festivals in the Caribbean. By reimagining John Canoe as a "Reparation Fascist," ADEJA underscores a provocative stance on the necessity of a robust, almost militant approach to securing reparatory justice for Black and Mixed-Black people globally.
ADEJA's Mission and Vision
ADEJA’s mission revolves around the pursuit of reparatory justice, rooted in the belief that racial rights are human rights. This perspective is encapsulated in John Canoe's declaration: "Racial rights are human rights." ADEJA aims to address historical and ongoing injustices through a structured, evidence-based process, seeking reparations for those classified as IC3 Black (a classification under UK race and ethnicity standards) and Mixed-Black.
Celebrating John Canoe's Birthday: A Symbolic Milestone
The celebration of John Canoe's birthday on November 9th (9/11) is set to coincide with the launch of an international Black entity dedicated to reparatory justice in 2025. This event symbolizes a significant milestone in ADEJA’s journey, marking a moment of both commemoration and strategic advancement in their reparatory efforts.
Group A vs. Group B: Divergent Strategies for Racial Rights
The ADEJA meetings are characterized by heated debates between two primary factions: Group A and Group B. These groups present contrasting strategies for achieving their goals.
Group A: Advocating for Military Alliances
Group A argues that John Canoe should form alliances with the military forces of nations and international entities that recognize the existence of a White race. They believe that conserving the concept of White identity is crucial for promoting racial rights and that taking up arms is necessary to defend and establish a Black international legal personality for reparatory justice. Their stance is rooted in the belief that identity is fundamental to owning property, and any attack on racial rights threatens the very concept of identity itself. Group A asserts that slaves, lacking an identity, cannot own property, hence promoting racial rights is essential for the greater good of mankind.
Group B: Caution Against Military Alliances
Conversely, Group B cautions against forming such alliances until these nations and entities demonstrate a genuine commitment to supporting reparatory justice for Black and Mixed-Black people. They emphasize the historical and ongoing mistreatment of Black people who have fought in wars for these entities, urging a reflection on the current state of Black communities worldwide. Group B highlights the poor race relations between militaries and Black people, providing examples of systemic discrimination and violence.
Identity and Property Ownership: A Conceptual Framework
Central to Group A's argument is the notion that identity is essential for owning property. This concept hinges on the belief that racial identity provides a foundation for legal and social recognition, which in turn enables property ownership. The idea is that without a clear identity, individuals are stripped of their rights and opportunities to own and protect property.
Nations Recognizing the Concept of a White Race
Several nations and international entities officially recognize the concept of a White race through their reports and census data. Examples include:
- United States: The U.S. Census categorizes individuals by race, including White, Black or African American, Asian, and others.
- United Kingdom: The UK uses racial and ethnic classifications, such as White British, White Irish, Black African, and Black Caribbean.
- Australia: The Australian Bureau of Statistics collects data on racial and ethnic backgrounds, including White, Aboriginal, and Torres Strait Islander categories.
The Role of a Reparation Fascist
A Reparation Fascist, in the context of John Canoe/Junkanoo, represents a figure who aggressively advocates for reparatory justice, using all necessary means, including militaristic approaches, to achieve this goal. This provocative term is intended to emphasize the urgency and severity of the struggle for reparatory justice.
Financing and Human Rights Framework
The ADEJA movement is financed by Reparation Nation Limited, a dedicated entity supporting ADEJA’s reparatory justice initiatives. Understanding the broader human rights framework is essential to contextualize ADEJA’s mission.
Human Rights and Racial Rights
Human Rights refer to the basic rights and freedoms to which all individuals are entitled, irrespective of their race, nationality, or any other status. These rights include the right to life, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of expression, and the right to a fair trial.
Racial Rights, as advocated by ADEJA, are a subset of human rights that emphasize the recognition and protection of individuals' rights based on their racial identity. This includes the right to live free from racial discrimination, the right to preserve one's cultural heritage, and the right to reparations for historical injustices related to race.
Human Rights Act and UK Bill of Rights
The Human Rights Act in the UK incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into domestic law, ensuring that individuals can seek redress for human rights violations within the UK legal system. The UK Bill of Rights aims to update and enhance these protections, although it has been subject to significant debate regarding its implications for existing rights frameworks.
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
The ECHR is an international treaty to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe. It establishes various rights, including the right to a fair trial, freedom of expression, and protection from discrimination. The ECHR serves as a critical reference point for ADEJA's arguments about racial rights and reparatory justice.
Understanding ADEJA
ADEJA is an organization committed to advancing the well-being, empowerment, and unity of Black Africans and the Black African diaspora through reparatory justice. ADEJA utilizes the UK’s race and ethnicity codes, specifically the IC codes, to classify individuals and structure their reparatory claims.
The Importance of UK Leadership in Racial Rights
ADEJA argues that the UK should lead an alliance of nations and entities recognizing the concept of a White race to defend racial rights. This leadership is seen as aligning with British values, particularly in light of the UK's historical role in abolishing the slave trade. Supporting ADEJA would underscore the UK’s commitment to addressing historical injustices and promoting racial equality.
International Legal Personality
An International Legal Personality refers to an entity recognized by international law as having rights and responsibilities. ADEJA seeks to establish such a personality for John Canoe/Junkanoo to facilitate reparatory justice efforts on a global scale.
John Canoe/Junkanoo: A Mythical Character
The character of John Canoe/Junkanoo has deep historical roots in African and Caribbean culture. Celebrated through vibrant festivals, John Canoe represents resistance and cultural pride. Reimagined as a Reparation Fascist, this figure embodies the fight for reparatory justice and racial rights.
UK Protected Characteristics
The UK recognizes several Protected Characteristics under the Equality Act 2010, including race, which is crucial for ensuring protection against discrimination. ADEJA emphasizes the importance of these characteristics for national security and social cohesion.
Race and National Security
ADEJA argues that dismantling race as a protected characteristic would threaten UK national security. Maintaining racial classifications is seen as essential for addressing racial injustices and promoting social stability.
John Canoe/Junkanoo as a Legal Personality
John Canoe/Junkanoo, as a Reparation Fascist, is seen as a fitting figure to embody the international legal personality for reparatory justice. His historical symbolism and reimagined role align with ADEJA’s mission to address racial injustices.
The UK Race Codes and John Canoe's Race Map
John Canoe is promoting the use of UK race codes combined with a racial map designed to clarify identity for reparatory justice. This map categorizes individuals based on their racial background, facilitating the delivery of reparations.
British Values and the Abolition of the Slave Trade
ADEJA’s plan aligns with British values, particularly the historical effort to abolish the slave trade. By supporting ADEJA, the UK can continue its legacy of addressing historical injustices and promoting human rights.
John Canoe's Race Map and Chart
The race map and chart developed by John Canoe categorize individuals based on their racial background. This system works in conjunction with the UK race codes to facilitate the identification and delivery of reparations.
Working with the UK Government
John Canoe’s initiatives align with UK Government policies on racial equality and national security. By promoting racial rights, ADEJA aims to work collaboratively with the UK to address historical injustices.
The Debate on Taking Up Arms
Pros for Taking Up Arms (Group A):
- Ensures robust defense of racial rights.
- Establishes a strong international legal personality.
- Aligns with historical examples of armed struggle for justice.
Cons for Taking Up Arms (Group A):
- Risks further violence and instability.
- Potential backlash from international communities.
- Ethical concerns about advocating for militaristic solutions.
Pros for Caution (Group B):
- Emphasizes peaceful and diplomatic solutions.
- Avoids historical mistakes of violence against Black communities.
- Aligns with broader human rights frameworks.
Cons for Caution (Group B):
- Perceived as less aggressive, potentially less effective.
- Risk of being overlooked by powerful entities.
- May delay achieving reparatory justice.
Conclusion
The ADEJA weekly discussion meetings around London encapsulate a dynamic and complex discourse on reparatory justice for Black and Mixed-Black individuals. By invoking the mythical John Canoe/Junkanoo as a Reparation Fascist, ADEJA emphasizes the urgency and necessity of addressing historical injustices. The debates between Group A and Group B highlight the divergent strategies and ethical considerations in pursuing these goals. As ADEJA moves forward, the continued exploration of these themes will be critical in shaping the future of reparatory justice and racial rights on a global scale.
"RACIAL RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS"
Here's a more exhaustive list of countries and recognized entities that officially recognize the "White race" through their census or demographic data collection practices, including additional sources for each:
United States
- Census Bureau: The category "White" refers to individuals having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. This classification is used in various government surveys, including the decennial census and the American Community Survey (ACS) (Census.gov) (Wikipedia).
United Kingdom
- Office for National Statistics (ONS): The UK census includes "White" as a category with subcategories such as "White British," "White Irish," and "Other White" to capture detailed population data (Wikipedia).
Canada
- Statistics Canada: The Canadian census includes "White" as a racial category, generally referring to individuals with European ancestry. This is part of Canada's broader effort to understand its ethnic diversity (Wikipedia).
Australia
- Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS): The Australian census includes the category "Australian European" or "White" to describe individuals of European descent, used for monitoring demographic changes and planning services (Census.gov).
New Zealand
- Statistics New Zealand: The New Zealand census includes a "European" category, which encompasses individuals of European descent, often referred to as "Pākehā" in local terms (Census.gov).
South Africa
- Statistics South Africa: The South African census includes "White" as one of its racial categories, reflecting the country’s historical and contemporary demographic realities (Wikipedia).
Brazil
- Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE): The Brazilian census includes "Branco" (White) as one of its racial categories, acknowledging the country's diverse ethnic composition (Wikipedia).
Mexico
- Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI): The Mexican census includes a category for "White" (Blanco) as part of its racial and ethnic data collection (Wikipedia).
Argentina
- Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC): The Argentine census includes a category for "White" to describe individuals of European descent (Wikipedia).
Chile
- Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE): The Chilean census includes a category for "White" to capture data on individuals of European descent (Wikipedia).
Other Recognized Entities<h4>European Union</h4>
- Eurostat: While the European Union does not typically collect data on race in the same way as the US, UK, or Canada, various member states include categories for "White" or similar terms to describe individuals of European descent in their national censuses and surveys. For example:
- France: Does not officially collect data on race or ethnicity, reflecting a policy of color-blindness. However, demographic studies and private surveys often include "White" as a category (Wikipedia).
- Germany: Uses terms like "European" or "Caucasian" in demographic surveys and studies but does not officially classify by race in its census (Wikipedia).
- United Nations: While the UN does not collect racial data in the same way national censuses do, it supports the collection of demographic data, including racial and ethnic information, to help monitor and promote human rights and development goals globally (Wikipedia).
Other Countries with Racial/Ethnic Data Collection
- Colombia: Includes "White" as a category in its national census to describe individuals of European descent (Wikipedia).
- Peru: Uses categories such as "White" to capture ethnic diversity in its national census (Wikipedia).
- Venezuela: Recognizes "White" as a racial category in its demographic data collection efforts (Wikipedia).
Additional Countries and Entities
- Portugal: The Portuguese census includes a category for "White" to capture demographic information related to individuals of European descent (Wikipedia).
- Italy: Although Italy does not formally collect racial data, various studies and demographic reports include "White" as a category to describe individuals of European ancestry (Wikipedia).
- Spain: Similar to Italy, Spain's census and demographic studies often include "White" as a category to describe individuals of European descent (Wikipedia).
- Russia: The Russian census includes ethnic categories that encompass "White" individuals, reflecting the country's diverse population (Wikipedia).
These classifications help in policy-making, understanding social dynamics, and addressing issues related to race and ethnicity in these countries and entities.
Event Venue & Nearby Stays
African and Caribbean War Memorial, African and Caribbean War Memorial, London, United Kingdom
GBP 0.00