Name: Niko Kolodny, UCL Shearman Lectures | 3: Objections and Applications
Start: 2024-06-07T15:00:00+01:00
End: 2024-06-07T17:00:00+01:00
Location: Central House

Niko Kolodny, UCL Shearman Lectures | 3: Objections and Applications

This is the third of three lectures by Prof Niko Kolodny (UC Berkeley), on the topic of Privacy and its Violation.
About this Event

The UCL Philosophy Department's run every 2-3 years. Recent Shearman Lecturers include Miranda Fricker, Kit Fine, Robert Pippin, and Judith Jarvis Thomson.

is Professor of Philosophy at UC Berkeley, and the author of influential works on the topics of love, rationality, and democracy, among other topics.

The lectures will be held from 3.00-5.00pm, in Room 225 of UCL's building, on Upper Woburn Place.

Lecture 3: Objections and Applications. This third lecture identifies various objections to privacy: countervailing interests that I and others have in your not having privacy—which argue against my owing you a duty of privacy. These objections to privacy give the duties of privacy their final contours. The lecture then asks what the moral framework constructed so far in the lectures implies for the ever-present surveillance of our lives insofar as our lives are linked to the internet or still more the “internet of things.” It considers the puzzle of “inferential laundering,” where, on the one hand, your privacy is not violated if I come to believe that you are G by inferring it from the facts that you are F and that Fs are G, even though, on the other hand, your privacy would be violated if I came to believe that you are G by some more direct route. It considers the puzzle of “publicizing the already public,” where, on the one hand, I do not violate your privacy by making certain information available to everyone in way A, which we are apt to describe as “making the information public,” even though, on the other hand, someone else violates your privacy by making that same information available to certain people (perhaps everyone) in way B. And it suggests that it may be a kind of myth that individually or collectively, we own “our data,” such that another wrongs us, individually or collectively, if they use “our data” without our valid consent. If we have complaints against what Shoshana Zuboff has aptly called “surveillance capitalism,” the lecture suggests, they may be of a different character.